Australia in back lane.

 

If not for the dreaded wars that have agonizingly pulled in everyone's attention and concern, the following event in Australia would have hovered over the media, as headline news. What Australia has done recently is, in my opinion, wrong in these modern times. 

On October 14, the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, with some optimism, held a referendum on recognizing the constitution of the indigenious people of Australia, the natives who had been in Australia for more than 60,000 years; about 4% or 26 million of them now. Significantly, it was only in 1788 the ancestors of the present Australians settled in the land. They came as convicts exiled from the British Isles. Gradually, the British colonialised the land. In January 1901, the six British colonies united and became one Commonwealth of Australia with British approval, and later, in March 1986, Australia legally  gained independence from Britain.

Of the people who took part in the referendum, most said 'no' to the indigenous people being acknowledged and validated properly, of their existence, in the constitution. What a disappointing reaction! Other countries are bending backwards to get their natives of the lands to come into the society, so that they, too, can  be helped to experience the benefits that the citizens are getting. But in Australia, 'no'. The Australians feel that recognizing the natives into the constitution  will later on bring all sorts of problems. Of course, the natives will demand equal rights and other benefits, and the government will have to look into them. The Australians are afraid that their well-being could be compromised in some way. But what is ironic is that the natives could enrol as voters and vote! Selfish and absurd, is it not? For a nation that calls itself well advanced!

My hats off to USA and UK, where the natives and other ethnic minority are recognized and can be elected to the highest post of the nation! Who can forget Barrack Obama and now  Rishi Sunak. Then, there is Kamala Devi Harris, for  good measure! How gracious and civilized the citizens of these nations are! Their nations are the real advanced ones - advanced in thinking and action, of matureness. 

Who knows, Australia could be like them, someday, it too, being controlled by the white majority. I hope it is soon.

Israel-Hamas war - another curse.

Wars after wars. Man, killing man. This seems to be the curse that fell on the world since it was created.

On top of witnessing the tragedies  and havocs of the Russian-Ukraine war, which does not seem to end, our hearts and minds have been turned into more despair and agony to witness another brutal war, this time, without any forewarning - the war between Israel and Hamas of Gaza, in the middle-east. This time around, Hamas, the militant organisation in Gaza, is seen to be the starter of the war.

On 7th October, a religious holiday of the Jewish Sabbath, it is said that more than 3000 rockets were launched from Gaza into southern and central Israel. Coincidentally, hang-gliders, as well as motorized paragliders, motorbikes, and speedy four-wheeled vehicles, were their convenient transport armaments of attack. No barriers were made to obstruct them. Bulldozers had been readily brought in the forefront, to penetrate the defensive walls. More Hamas militants arrived on motorboats to the Israellian beaches to attack the beach goers and take many of them as hostages. All, planned in advance, meticulously planned!

Most of the Muslim countries seem to utter tones of  support towards Hamas, somewhat indicating that the people of Palestine have been bullied by Israel for too long, and it is not surprising for the Hamas' fury. Israel's strong contention is that the land on which the Palestinians dwell is theirs, and they are doing everything to safeguard their security. The Palestinians vigorously disagree with these assertions.

USA is the strongest supporter of Israel, followed by almost all the European countries. This war has put some countries, especially the Muslim ones in a predicament, in an embarrassing position.  They, being Muslim countries,  are obliged to give  support to the Hamas, and they are wary because they are also friendly with USA. Anything they may say or do in favour of Hamas may anger or displease the superpower USA. Uneasy situation, indeed. Well-known Muslim  countries that are, in some way, friendly with USA are Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates. Hamas, too, has its own allies; Iran, Qatar, Lebanon, being the main ones.

Coming back to the dreaded war and also all the other wars, as well,  how I wish wars followed the ancient system of warring, where innocent civilian deaths were very rare. where two intending-to-war nations will come to an agreement to have the battlefield in a certain area.  Deaths of civilians were subsequently avoided. Of course, there were no dreadful armaments of explosion, then. Only the horses, knives, swords, and shields were in play. Deaths were only to the persons bravely seeking it, or prepared for it. Now? Innocent people, not involved in any disputes, are killed, maimed, blown to pieces! How unfair! How heart-wrecking! 

Cursed, be the men who discovered and modified explosive materials! One such man is Alfred Nobel. 'Sir' Alfred Nobel, now! And they are giving out Nobel prizes to people in remembrance of him! How absurd and unthinkable!  So, they say Alfred Nobel realized his mistake, and to make amends, he institutionalized the Nobel prize, to be given to those who made notable contribution to science, medicine, literature, and peace. Some peace we are having! And they are giving out Nobel prizes in remembrance of him, the creator of dynamite, and thence, the bomb! How unnoble! 

Ai's CHATGPT on all fronts, on God and mankind.

The advent of humanity on this earth has always been intriguing me. The bible's version is very popular but the answers to my doubts seem to be not clarified. No, I did not read the bible fully, only the first few pages that pulled my interest, greatly. But I have read a few Christian magazines and they did not clear up my various doubts. The well acclaimed Ai based 'chatgpt' is around! So, I thought why not approach it. So, here I go!

But first, my sincere declaration . I am a respecter of all religions and I will never look down on any. If, in some way, my questions here to chatgpt hurt anyone I apologize. Please read on! I will be very happy if you, too, are satisfied with your perception and acceptance of our ancestors on earth.

ME;

 In the bible, it is stated that God made Adam and Eve and told them to multiply but did not teach them how. Only when the serpent asked them to eat forbidden apple did they know how to multiply. Then, why should God be angry at Adam and Eve and the serpent?

CHATGPT;

The biblical narrative you mentioned is a symbolic story, and interpretations may vary. However, a common understanding is that the disobedience of Adam and Eve by eating the forbidden fruit represents a violation of God's command. It's not that they learned how to multiply from eating the fruit, but rather they disobeyed God's explicit instruction.

God's anger in the story is typically viewed as a consequence of disobedience, emphasizing the importance of free will and moral choices. The serpent, often associated with temptation, plays a role in leading Adam and Eve astray. The story is a moral lesson about the consequences of disobedience and the significance of following divine commands.

ME;

Did God tell Adam and Eve how to multiply?

CHATGPT;

In the biblical narrative, God's command to "be fruitful and multiply" is found in Genesis 1:28. However, the specific details of how reproduction works are not explicitly mentioned in the text. The idea is that God intended for Adam and Eve to procreate and populate the Earth, leaving the intricacies of reproduction to natural processes.

The disobedience of Adam and Eve, as described in Genesis 3, involves eating the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. This act is often seen as a symbolic representation of humanity's inclination to go against God's commands and seek knowledge independently. The punishment they face is a result of disobedience rather than a lack of information about reproduction.

ME;

Did God allow incest which is a crime?

CHATGPT;

The biblical narrative, particularly in the Old Testament, does mention instances that might be interpreted as involving close relatives marrying or having children. However, it's essential to approach these texts with an understanding of cultural and historical contexts.

In the early chapters of Genesis, Adam and Eve's descendants are mentioned, and due to the limited population at that time, close relatives likely married each other. It's important to note that interpretations of religious texts can vary, and different religious traditions may offer distinct perspectives on these narratives.

n many modern societies, incest is considered taboo and illegal due to genetic concerns and potential harm to offspring. However, ancient cultures had different practices and beliefs.

It's crucial to approach discussions about biblical narratives with sensitivity, recognizing that interpretations can differ among individuals and religious denominations. If you have specific questions about a particular religious perspective, it might be helpful to consult with religious scholars or leaders from that tradition.

ME;

You mean so far the christian clerics did not debate about this multiplying and serpent matter as well as the incest matter. Looks like they swept them under the carpet to make Christianity look good! Didn't they?

CHATGPT;

The interpretation of religious texts, including those in Christianity, has been the subject of much debate and discussion over centuries. Different Christian denominations and theologians may have varying perspectives on how to interpret specific passages, including those related to creation, Adam and Eve, and other biblical stories.

It's important to recognize that interpretations of religious texts are influenced by various factors, including cultural, historical, and theological considerations. Scholars and clerics within Christianity have engaged in extensive debates and discussions on these matters, and perspectives may continue to evolve.

While some theological perspectives emphasize metaphorical or symbolic interpretations of certain passages, others may take a more literal approach. Debates within religious communities are not uncommon, and individuals within those communities may hold diverse views.

It's advisable to engage in open and respectful discussions with theologians, scholars, or religious leaders who can provide insights into the specific interpretations within a particular Christian tradition. Keep in mind that interpretations can vary, and not all individuals within a religious community will share the same perspective.

ME;

Don't you think it would have been better if God created two males and two females so that this matter of incest did not happen. Or maybe, God indeed created two males and two females but nobody realized it. What do you think? Isn't this possible?

CHATGPT;

The question you raise touches on theological and philosophical considerations. The story of Adam and Eve is often understood within a religious context, and interpretations can vary. Some may view it as a literal historical account, while others see it as a symbolic narrative with deeper spiritual or moral meanings.

If you consider the idea of God creating multiple pairs, it's essential to remember that religious narratives often convey messages beyond the literal details. The focus of the story might be on broader themes such as human relationships, free will, and moral choices rather than the logistics of initial human creation.

Theological perspectives vary widely, and some believers may find metaphorical or symbolic interpretations more meaningful. Others may adhere to a more literal understanding. Ultimately, the interpretation of these narratives depends on one's faith tradition, personal beliefs, and the guidance of religious authorities.

It's an intriguing topic that has been discussed and debated by theologians and scholars throughout history, and different religious denominations may offer distinct perspectives on the matter.

ME;

Thank you.

CHATGPT;

You're welcome! If you have any more questions or if there's anything else I can help you with, feel free to ask.

Well, there you are. Did I get what I wanted? Did chatgpt really satisfy me with its answers? Sorry, no. I feel that it is trying to bulldoze its way out. What I got to understand from its presentation is that it was saying that the religious verses had been written and had existed for thousands of years, and I should accept it as it is. And, if I really want to be enlightened, " it might be helpful to consult with religious scholars or leaders from that tradition", it says.

 I rather prefer the Google way of presentation; more professional, and not human-like, like chatgpt, Ha ha! Thanks, chatgpt,  for answering like a human. But no thanks. I would rather use a customerily professional search engine like Google,  than the humanly chatgpf. For, humans are not perfect , Oops!